Construction
"The sub looked great on paper. Then they disappeared halfway through a $500K job."
Construction has the highest business failure rate of any major industry. Long project cycles, complex subcontractor chains, and mechanics lien exposure create layers of risk most general contractors, developers, and specialty contractors never see coming.
Construction Risk Snapshot
Why construction risk is uniquely dangerous
Subcontractor Bankruptcy Mid-Project
A sub goes under halfway through your project. Work stops. You’re scrambling for a replacement. The timeline is blown and your client is furious.
Mechanics Lien Exposure
Your sub didn’t pay their sub-subcontractors or suppliers. Now they’ve filed a mechanics lien — against your project. You’re liable for debts you didn’t incur.
Material Supplier Failures
Your material supplier’s financial health is invisible to you — until they can’t deliver. Mid-project failures create cascading delays that cost more than the materials.
GC Payment Risk
If you’re a subcontractor, your biggest risk is the GC’s solvency. If they go under before paying you, you’re unsecured and competing against every other vendor.
Underbidding as Desperation
When a contractor bids 30% below everyone else, that’s not efficiency — it’s cash flow desperation. When they can’t deliver, your project is collateral damage.
Bonding Capacity Risk
Working with financially risky subs affects your own bonding capacity and insurance premiums. One bad relationship can impact your ability to bid future work.
How Command Insights Protects Construction Businesses
Vet subcontractors, suppliers, and GCs in under 5 minutes — before you sign the contract, not after the project falls apart.
See financial stability scores to identify overleveraged subs before you hire them
Check payment histories to spot subs who aren’t paying their own vendors
Review public records for liens, judgments, and UCC filings
Verify GC financial health before taking on a project as a sub
Assess material supplier viability to protect your project timeline
Vet faster than checking references — with data that doesn’t lie
A general contractor in Arizona evaluated three subs for a $200K project phase. The third bid 30% lower. Before signing, the GC pulled a Command Insights report. It showed declining payment scores, two outstanding judgments, and a stability score in the bottom 15% of the industry. The GC chose the second bidder. Two months later, the low-bid sub filed for bankruptcy mid-project with another GC.
Protect your next project.
Stop betting your margins on subcontractors and suppliers you haven’t vetted.
Start Your Subscription — $69.99/mo